extuno
Extuno vs extension risk scoring services
Some services rate browser extension and connected-app risk with an AI risk score for governance. Extuno focuses on the code and its changes - diffing every version and running each extension in a dynamic sandbox - and also covers npm, PyPI, WordPress, Composer, and Maven packages.
What is an extension risk-scoring service?
This category of SaaS platform produces an AI-driven risk score for browser extensions and connected applications, typically on a 0 to 100 scale, using criteria like requested permissions, behavior, publisher reputation, and data flows. These platforms are often used to govern extensions and OAuth apps across an organization, for example in a workspace or browser-management setting, and may offer a free checker alongside a paid platform.
How does Extuno compare?
Both turn extension risk into an evidence-backed score. Extuno's emphasis is the code and how it changes: it diffs every version to catch an extension that was clean at install and poisoned through an update, and it runs each one in an ephemeral, network-segmented micro-VM to record the endpoints and payloads it actually contacts. Extuno also analyzes developer packages such as npm, PyPI, WordPress, Composer, and Maven, with the file, line, and evidence on every finding.
When should you choose Extuno?
Choose Extuno when you want per-version code diffing, dynamic sandbox evidence, and package-ecosystem coverage alongside browser extensions. A risk-scoring and governance platform is a strong fit for organizations centered on SaaS and OAuth app posture. The two address overlapping but different parts of the problem, and some teams use both.