extuno
Extuno vs extension risk scoring services
Some services rate browser extension and connected-app risk with an AI risk score for governance. Extuno focuses on the code and its changes - diffing every version and running each extension in a dynamic sandbox - and also covers npm, PyPI, and WordPress packages.
What is an extension risk-scoring service?
This category of SaaS platform produces an AI-driven risk score for browser extensions and connected applications, typically on a 0 to 100 scale, using criteria like requested permissions, behavior, publisher reputation, and data flows. These platforms are often used to govern extensions and OAuth apps across an organization, for example in a workspace or browser-management setting, and may offer a free checker alongside a paid platform.
What goes into each score?
Both end in a score. The difference is what the score is built from. Extuno's emphasis is the code and how it changes: it diffs every version to catch an extension that was clean at install and poisoned through an update, and it runs each one in an ephemeral, network-segmented micro-VM to record the endpoints and payloads it actually contacts. Extuno also analyzes developer packages such as npm, PyPI, and WordPress, with the file, line, and evidence on every finding.
Governance posture, or code-level evidence?
Choose Extuno when you want per-version code diffing, dynamic sandbox evidence, and package-ecosystem coverage alongside browser extensions. A risk-scoring and governance platform is a strong fit for organizations centered on SaaS and OAuth app posture. One governs which extensions your organization allows. The other reads what the code inside them does.